In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-2690 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 7 5700. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $98 cheaper!
Xeon E5-2690
- Up to 62% cheaper – $58.90 vs $156.85
- Up to 62% cheaper
- Up to 42% better value in Battlefield 6 – $0.96 vs $1.65/FPS
- Up to 42% better value in Battlefield 6
Ryzen 7 5700
- Up to 56% faster in Battlefield 6 – 95 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 56% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 10 years and 28 days newer – Apr 04, 2022 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 10 years and 28 days newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 65 vs 135 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2690 vs Ryzen 7 5700: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2690
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
64%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
65%
Price, $
$58.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 5700
Apr 4th, 2022
Average FPS
95 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
71 FPS
100%
Price, $
$156.85
37%
Value, $/FPS
$1.65/FPS
58%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2690 vs Ryzen 7 5700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2690 vs Ryzen 7 5700 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2690
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 5700
Apr 4th, 2022
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2690 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 5700 Apr 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Released | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $179.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | AM4 |
| 135 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
