In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-2690 v3 is quite a bit slower than the Core i5-13400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2690 v3
No clear advantages
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 54% faster in Battlefield 6 – 106 vs 69 FPS
- Up to 54% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 3 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 8 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 65 vs 135 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2690 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
76%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
44%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
83%
L3 Cache
20 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2690 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| $2,090.00 | MSRP | $196.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 135W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
