Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 120 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 62% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 84 vs 52 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
84
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€382.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €382.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 170 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |