Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 3409 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 29% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 159 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 28 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i7-14700F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2667 v3 | vs | Core i7-14700F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 20 |
| 8 | Threads | 28 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 135 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
