In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-2667 v2 is much slower than the Ryzen 9 7900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-2667 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 130 vs 170 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Ryzen 9 7900X
- Up to 105% faster in Battlefield 6 – 131 vs 64 FPS
- Up to 105% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 25 days newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 9 years and 25 days newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2667 v2 vs Ryzen 9 7900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 7900X
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
131 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
98 FPS
100%
Price, $
$314.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.4/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2667 v2 vs Ryzen 9 7900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2667 v2 vs Ryzen 9 7900X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2667 v2
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
20 MB
31%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
71%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 7900X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2667 v2 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7900X Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | AM5 |
130 W | Power Consumption | 170 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
