Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2665 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4242 days newer than Xeon E5-2665.
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 75% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-2665 - 785 vs 448 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 32 vs 16 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
785
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€468.37
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €468.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8534 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2665 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
115 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |