Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E5-2660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3612 days newer than Xeon E5-2660.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2660
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 20% better in Borderlands 3 than Xeon E5-2660 - 238 vs 198 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 - 58 vs 95 Watts
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Xeon E5-2660
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2660 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
