Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2135 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v2.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 20% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 224 vs 186 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
224
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €82.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2650 v2 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |