Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 4325 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2640
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 19% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2640 - 140 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 16 vs 12 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
140
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€243.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €243.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |