Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3068 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v2.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2630L v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 19% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 379 vs 318 FPS
- Consumes up to 3% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 58 vs 60 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2630L v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2630L v2 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 60 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
