Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms Xeon E5-2603 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2603 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2603 v3
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 85 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 12% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E5-2603 v3 - 276 vs 246 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2603 v3 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2603 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-2603 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 5 7600X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2603 v3 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 6 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
