Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 3788 days newer than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2420
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 95 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 65% better in New World than Xeon E5-2420 - 160 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2420 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€382.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €382.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2420 | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |