Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3788 days newer than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2420
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 16% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-2420 - 147 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2420 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€303.01
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €303.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 717 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2420 | vs | Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 14 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |