Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 3304 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 130 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 118% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 161 vs 74 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
161
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€769.42
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €769.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 271 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 170 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |