In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E3-1280 v5 is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-14900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1280 v5
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 80 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 86% faster in Battlefield 6 – 136 vs 73 FPS
- Up to 86% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 11 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Oct 19, 2015
- Is 7 years and 11 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1280 v5 vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
136 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
102 FPS
100%
Price, $
$442.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1280 v5 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1280 v5 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1280 v5
Oct 19th, 2015
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
67%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1280 v5 Oct 19th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| $612.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
80W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
