Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 3077 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1275 v3
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E3-1275 v3 - 203 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€417.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €417.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1275 v3 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |