Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3543 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1275 v2
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 10% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 129 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 58 vs 77 Watts
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E3-1275 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1275 v2 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 77 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD P4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
