In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E3-1265L v3 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 5 5600X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 5 5600X
- Up to 41% faster in Battlefield 6 – 97 vs 69 FPS
- Up to 41% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 5 months newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 7 years and 5 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1265L v3 vs Ryzen 5 5600X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 5600X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
97 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
73 FPS
100%
Price, $
$223.62
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.3/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1265L v3 vs Ryzen 5 5600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1265L v3 vs Ryzen 5 5600X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1265L v3
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
80%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 5600X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1265L v3 Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 5600X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $299.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM4 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, DDR4 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
