Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E3-1260L v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2290 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L v5.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1260L v5
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 45 vs 58 Watts
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 20% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E3-1260L v5 - 664 vs 553 FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1260L v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1260L v5 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
