Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 2208 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v5.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1240 v5
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 9% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 336 vs 309 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
336
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€493.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €493.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 247 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |