In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E3-1240 v3 is much slower than the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1240 v3
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 80 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 33% less energy
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Up to 124% faster in Battlefield 6 – 159 vs 71 FPS
- Up to 124% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1240 v3 vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1240 v3 vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1240 v3 vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
6%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
31%
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1240 v3 Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7950X3D Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$273.00 | MSRP | $699.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM5 |
80 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
