In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E3-1240 v2 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 5 7600. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1240 v2
No clear advantages
Ryzen 5 7600
- Up to 94% faster in Battlefield 6 – 120 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 94% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer – Jan 14, 2023 vs May 14, 2012
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 6% less energy – 65 vs 69 Watts
- Consumes up to 6% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1240 v2 vs Ryzen 5 7600: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 7600
Jan 14th, 2023
Average FPS
120 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.58/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1240 v2 vs Ryzen 5 7600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1240 v2 vs Ryzen 5 7600 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1240 v2
May 14th, 2012
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 7600
Jan 14th, 2023
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1240 v2 May 14th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 7600 Jan 14th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 14th, 2012 | Released | Jan 14th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $229.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | AM5 |
| 69 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
