Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon E3-1230 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4580 days newer than Xeon E3-1230.
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 41% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E3-1230 - 298 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1230 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1230 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
298
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€494.19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €494.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1230 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |