Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon E-2334 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 483 days newer than Xeon E-2334.
Advantages of Xeon E-2334
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 32% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E-2334 - 259 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2334 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E-2334 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
259
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1169
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,169 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E-2334 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |