Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2324G outperforms Ryzen 5 5600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2324G is 224 days older than Ryzen 5 5600.
Advantages of Xeon E-2324G
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 5600 - 120 vs 118 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2324G - 12 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
118
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€122.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €122.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E-2324G | vs | Ryzen 5 5600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics P750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |