Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 42 days older than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX - 454 vs 445 FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX - 58 vs 280 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2038
92%
Multi-Core
16424
100%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | vs | Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
| Chagall | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 58 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
