Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX outperforms Core i3-12100F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 42 days newer than Core i3-12100F.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 48 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX - 58 vs 280 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2065
93%
Multi-Core
14738
100%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | vs | Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
| Chagall | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 58 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
