Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1629 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 286 vs 271 FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 58 vs 180 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
