The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Celeron G3930T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 35 vs 120 Watts
Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Celeron G3930T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
219
100%
Min 1% FPS
144
100%
Price, €
€797.65
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.64/FPS
100%
Celeron G3930T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
169
77%
Min 1% FPS
113
78%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Celeron G3930T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Celeron G3930T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Celeron G3930T in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Celeron G3930T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
2 MB
2%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
46%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 9 7950X3D | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
$699.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Raphael | Codename | Kaby Lake |
120 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
Performance | ||
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
4.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.7 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
128 MB | L3 Cache | 2 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR5 @ 5200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |