Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-11600 - 220 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-11600
- Up to 27% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - €284.53 vs €387.26
- Up to 20% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 7900X - €1.40 vs €1.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 65 vs 170 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
220
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.76/FPS
80%
Price, €
€387.26
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for €387.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 436 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
203
92%
Value, €/FPS
€1.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€284.53
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €284.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 436 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 7900X | vs | Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raphael | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 65 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
47.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |