In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 9 4900H is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-12900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 9 4900H
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-12900F
- Up to 40% faster in Battlefield 6 – 116 vs 83 FPS
- Up to 40% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Mar 16, 2020
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 9 4900H vs Core i9-12900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 4900H vs Core i9-12900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 4900H vs Core i9-12900F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 4900H
Mar 16th, 2020
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
86%
Max. LPDDR4 RAM Speed
4266 MHz
89%
Core i9-12900F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 9 4900H Mar 16th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900F Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2020 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $494.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP6 | Socket | LGA1700 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4266 MHz (LPDDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
