In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 9 3900X is slightly faster than the Core i5-10400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 9 3900X
- Up to 10% faster in Battlefield 6 – 87 vs 79 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Battlefield 6
Core i5-10400F
- Is 9 months and 24 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jul 07, 2019
- Is 9 months and 24 days newer
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 65 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i5-10400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
79 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
59 FPS
91%
Price, $
$139.55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i5-10400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i5-10400F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 3900X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
93%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 9 3900X Jul 7th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 7th, 2019 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $499.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 105 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
