Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1023 days newer than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 15 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 41% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U - 222 vs 157 FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U | vs | Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Picasso | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon Vega 10 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
