Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 1542 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900X.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 17% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900X - 157 vs 134 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - €639.00 vs €683.51
- Up to 20% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900X - €4.07 vs €5.10 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-10900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 8700G - 20 vs 16 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
157
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€639
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €639 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8596 minutes ago
Buy for €683.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8597 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 8700G | vs | Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Not Available | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
4 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon 780M | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |