Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 5700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 5700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 275 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 5700.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €164.19 vs €533.45
- Up to 67% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-13900F - €0.90 vs €2.74 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 7 5700 - 195 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 5700 - 32 vs 16 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
183
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
100%
Price, €
€164.19
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €164.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.74/FPS
33%
Price, €
€533.45
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for €533.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 5700 | vs | Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |