The Ryzen 7 2700 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i5-2400S. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 2700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-2400S
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Ryzen 7 2700 cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core i5-2400S for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 7 2700
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
180
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-2400S
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
168
93%
Min 1% FPS
113
94%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core i5-2400S in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core i5-2400S in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 7 2700 vs Core i5-2400S in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 7 2700
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i5-2400S
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 7 2700 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
$299.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
16 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
No | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |