Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1224 days newer than Ryzen 5 PRO 2600.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 38% better in F1 23 than Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 - 279 vs 202 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 - 58 vs 65 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
Desktop • Sep 19th, 2018
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
