Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 7500F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 7500F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 298 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 7500F.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7500F
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €399.00 vs €495.00
- Up to 13% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-13900K - €4.20 vs €4.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 7% better in Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 5 7500F - 102 vs 95 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7500F - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 7500F doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
Buy for €495 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 22nd, 2023
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 7500F | vs | Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 22nd, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |