In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 5 4600HS is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-14700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 5 4600HS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 64% faster in Battlefield 6 – 126 vs 77 FPS
- Up to 64% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 4 years and 2 days newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 06, 2020
- Is 4 years and 2 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
126 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
94 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.4/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 4600HS vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 4600HS
Jan 6th, 2020
Cores
6-core
30%
L3 Cache
8 MB
24%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
74%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
4266 MHz
76%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 5 4600HS Jan 6th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 6th, 2020 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP6 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4266 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
