In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 5 3600XT is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 5 3600XT
No clear advantages
Core i9-10900
- Up to 2% faster in Battlefield 6 – 88 vs 86 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 months and 24 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jul 07, 2019
- Is 9 months and 24 days newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 5 3600XT vs Core i9-10900: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 3600XT vs Core i9-10900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 3600XT vs Core i9-10900 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 3600XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
87%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
62%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
92%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 5 3600XT Jul 7th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900 Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 7th, 2019 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$249.00 | MSRP | $483.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
