Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 912 days older than the more expensive Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 6% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - €82.15 vs €87.51
- Up to 5% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G6900 - €0.39 vs €0.41 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
211
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €82.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 252 minutes ago
Buy for €87.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 251 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |