Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1563 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €87.16 vs €494.19
- Up to 77% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-14900K - €0.52 vs €2.28 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 28% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 5 3400G - 217 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 32 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
169
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€87.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €87.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
217
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.28/FPS
23%
Price, €
€494.19
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €494.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |