The Ryzen 5 2600X is a faster gaming CPU than the Core i3-4150. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 2600X
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i3-4150
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 54 vs 95 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Ryzen 5 2600X cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Ryzen 5 2600X vs Core i3-4150 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 5 2600X
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
183
100%
Min 1% FPS
121
100%
Price, €
€69
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Core i3-4150
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
179
98%
Min 1% FPS
119
98%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 5 2600X vs Core i3-4150 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 2600X vs Core i3-4150 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 2600X vs Core i3-4150 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 2600X
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i3-4150
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
55%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 5 2600X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
$229.00 | MSRP | $117.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
95 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
16 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |