In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 5 2500U is quite a bit slower than the Core i5-13400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 5 2500U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 66% faster in Battlefield 6 – 106 vs 64 FPS
- Up to 66% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Oct 26, 2017
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 5 2500U vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 5 2500U vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 5 2500U vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 5 2500U
Oct 26th, 2017
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
78%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 5 2500U Oct 26th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 26th, 2017 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $196.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP5 | Socket | LGA1700 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
