Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 151 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 4100.
Advantages of Ryzen 3 4100
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - €102.53 vs €202.51
- Up to 43% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-12600KF - €0.58 vs €1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 13% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 3 4100 - 200 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 4100 - 16 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
177
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€102.53
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €102.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
200
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
57%
Price, €
€202.51
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for €202.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 4100 | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |