The Ryzen 3 3250U is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-14900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3250U
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i9-14900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Ryzen 3 3250U vs Core i9-14900F
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 3 3250U
Jan 6th, 2020
Average FPS
187
79%
Min 1% FPS
129
80%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
238
100%
Min 1% FPS
162
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 3 3250U vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 3 3250U vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 3 3250U
Jan 6th, 2020
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
60%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 3 3250U | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $524.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| 15 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.8 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
