Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1178 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €70.99 vs €495.00
- Up to 82% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-13900K - €0.42 vs €2.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 27% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 3 3200G - 214 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 32 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
168
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€70.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €70.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 270 minutes ago
Buy for €495 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8833 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |