Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 912 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - €70.23 vs €339.00
- Up to 78% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-12400 - €0.28 vs €1.26 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 6% better in Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen 3 3200G - 268 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
253
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€70.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €70.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6845 minutes ago
Buy for €339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6845 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |