The Phenom II X4 B95 is a slower gaming CPU than the FX-8120. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Phenom II X4 B95
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8120
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Phenom II X4 B95 vs FX-8120 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Phenom II X4 B95
Oct 1st, 2009
Average FPS
165
99%
Min 1% FPS
111
99%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
166
100%
Min 1% FPS
112
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Phenom II X4 B95 vs FX-8120 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Phenom II X4 B95 vs FX-8120 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Phenom II X4 B95 vs FX-8120 in core CPU performance specifications
Phenom II X4 B95
Oct 1st, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.012 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Phenom II X4 B95 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Deneb | Codename | Zambezi |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1333 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |