Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 4196 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of Phenom II X4 925
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 95 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 38% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Phenom II X4 925 - 121 vs 88 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 32 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1021.74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,021.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Deneb | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |